The best Heap alternatives & competitors, compared
Contents
Heap made its name with autocapture – install a snippet, start collecting everything, define events later. It's a powerful approach, especially for teams without dedicated data engineering resources.
But autocapture alone doesn't help you ship better products. Heap doesn't include feature flags, A/B testing, or error tracking, for example; its session replay lacks developer debugging tools, and key features like group analytics require a sales conversation.
If you've outgrown Heap or need more from your analytics stack, this guide compares the best alternatives – whether you want a similar tool or a full platform for building better products.
1. PostHog
- Founded: 2020
- Similar to: Heap, Amplitude
- Typical users: Engineers and product teams
- Typical customers: Mid-size B2Bs and startups

What is PostHog?
PostHog (that's us 👋) is an all-in-one platform combining product analytics, error tracking, session replays, web analytics, A/B testing, feature flags, user surveys, LLM observability,logs, and more into one product. This means it's not just an alternative to Heap, but also tools like LaunchDarkly and LogRocket.
Typical PostHog users are engineers and product managers at startups and mid-size companies, particularly B2B companies. Customers include Supabase, Lovable, ElevenLabs, and see all customers.
Key features
Product analytics: Funnels, user paths, retention analysis, custom trends, and dynamic user cohorts. Also supports SQL insights for power users.
Session replays: Including event timelines, console logs, and network activity, and 90-day data retention.
Feature flags: Release features to specific users safely with local evaluation (for faster performance) and JSON payloads.
A/B tests: Up to 9 test variations, primary and secondary metrics. Automatically calculate test duration, sample size, and statistical significance.
Surveys: Target surveys by event or person properties. Templates for Net Promoter Score (NPS), product-market fit (PMF) surveys, and more.
Error tracking: Monitor exceptions, stack traces, and crashes – connected directly to session replays, user behavior, and feature flag changes.
<<<<<<< HEAD
Data warehouse to import and query data from external sources like Stripe, Zendesk, Hubspot, or your existing warehouse – analyze business and product data together.
- Data warehouse: Import and query data from external sources like Stripe, Zendesk, Hubspot, or your existing warehouse – analyze business and product data together.
ad5c71eb9310f6bfcb982d41cc1901fa318966cb
How does PostHog compare to Heap?
PostHog is the most direct like-for-like alternative to Heap.
Unlike Mixpanel and Amplitude, PostHog supports event autocapture, which means it starts capturing data from the moment you deploy PostHog's code.
You can also create and label events using the PostHog toolbar. This is similar to Heap's visual labeling feature, though it's only supported on web apps.
Main differences between PostHog and Heap
- PostHog includes feature flags, A/B testing, surveys, error tracking, and LLM analytics; Heap doesn't offer any of these natively.
- PostHog's session replay includes console logs, network monitoring, DOM explorer, and performance metrics; Heap's replay is simpler and lacks developer debugging tools.
- PostHog includes a built-in data warehouse for importing and querying external data from Stripe, Hubspot, Zendesk, and more; Heap imports user context via "Sources" (Salesforce, Marketo, Segment, etc.) but queries happen within Heap's UI rather than via SQL.
- PostHog offers SQL access for custom queries; Heap doesn't support direct SQL querying.
- PostHog is open-source; Heap is closed-source and cloud-only.
Main similarities between PostHog and Heap
- Both support event autocapture that starts collecting data immediately after installation.
- Both include product analytics with funnels, retention charts, user paths, and cohorts.
- Both support heatmaps for understanding where users click and scroll.
- Both support group analytics for account-level analysis in B2B products.
- Both offer data warehouse exports — Heap Connect syncs to Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, and S3; PostHog exports to S3, BigQuery, Snowflake, and Redshift via batch exports.
Why do companies use PostHog?
According to reviews on G2, companies use PostHog because:
It replaces multiple tools: PostHog can replace Heap (product analytics), LaunchDarkly (feature flags and A/B testing), and Hotjar (session replay and surveys). This simplifies workflows and ensures all their data is in one place.
Pricing is transparent and scalable: Reviewers appreciate how PostHog's pricing scales as they grow. There's a generous free tier. Companies eligible for PostHog for Startups also get $50k in additional free credits.
They need a complete picture of users: PostHog includes every tool necessary to understand users and improve products. This means creating funnels to track conversion, watching replays to see where users get stuck, testing solutions with A/B tests, and gathering feedback with user surveys.
Bottom line
PostHog offers product analytics with autocapture, session replay, and a visual labeling tool for creating events. This, combined with additional features like feature flags, A/B testing, and surveys, makes it an excellent like-for-like replacement for Heap.
2. FullStory
- Founded: 2012
- Most similar to: PostHog, Glassbox
- Typical users: Product managers, customer success, and support
- Typical customers: Online retailers and SaaS companies

What is FullStory?
FullStory describes itself as Digital Experience Intelligence, which is code for session replay and mobile app analytics, with a side of product analytics. Like Heap and PostHog, it supports event autocapture, so you don't have to manually code every event you want to capture.
Key features
Session replay: Watch and analyze real user sessions on web and mobile apps.
Product analytics: Understand user paths and struggle points.
Event autocapture: Tagless event capture that ensures all events are tracked.
Heatmaps: Find out where users click and frustration points.
Mobile app analytics: Crash analytics and users path analysis.
How does FullStory compare to Heap?
FullStory and Heap share a similar feature set – autocapture, product analytics, session replay, and heatmaps – but FullStory leans more toward session replay and user experience debugging, while Heap is stronger on the analytics side with its visual event editor and retroactive event definition.
Main differences between FullStory and Heap
- FullStory's core strength is session replay with frustration signals (rage clicks, dead clicks, error clicks); Heap leads with product analytics and retroactive event definition.
- Heap has a visual event editor for non-technical users to tag and define events without code; FullStory doesn't offer an equivalent labeling tool.
- Heap offers managed ETL for exporting data to warehouses; FullStory's data export options are more limited.
- FullStory is more commonly used by customer success and support teams; Heap is primarily used by product managers.
- Heap's free tier is limited to 10,000 sessions/month; FullStory's free plan (FullstoryFree) includes 30,000 sessions with 12 months of data retention.
Main similarities between FullStory and Heap
- Both offer session replay and heatmaps for understanding user behavior.
- Both include product analytics with funnels, user paths, and conversion tracking.
- Both are designed to be accessible to non-technical teams.
- Neither offers feature flags, A/B testing, or surveys natively.
- Both integrate with third-party tools like Segment, Salesforce, and Slack.
- Both are closed-source, cloud-only platforms.
Why do companies use FullStory?
According to reviews on G2, companies use FullStory for:
Easier collaboration: As an accessible tool for non-technical users, FullStory facilitates collaboration between product, UX, and engineering teams by allowing all teams to access useful, reliable data.
Viewing user issues: Support teams use FullStory to replay sessions to understand user hard to replicate problems, and identify bugs that need fixing.
Improving conversion: FullStory users like to combine funnel insights with replays of user sessions to understand pain points and improve conversion.
Bottom line
FullStory is a good Heap alternative for non-technical teams, particularly customer success and support teams who need to diagnose user problems. It has superior session replay features, though arguably is less focused on analytics use cases than Heap or PostHog.
3. Glassbox
- Founded: 2010
- Most similar to: FullStory
- Typical users: Business analysts, product support
- Typical customers: Retail and financial services

What is Glassbox?
Glassbox is a session replay and analytics platform with a particular focus on mobile apps and e-commerce use cases. Customers include UK retailer Sainsbury's, Marriott, and Experian.
Unlike Heap, which is mainly used by product managers, G2 suggests Glassbox is predominantly used by business analysts and support teams.
Key features
Session replay: Watch and analyze real user sessions on web and mobile apps.
Product analytics: Understand user paths and struggle points.
Performance analytics: Track app performance and their impact on conversion rates.
Click, scroll and heatmaps: Understand where users interact with your app.
User feedback: Gather satisfaction and user feedback on app experience.
How does Glassbox compare to Heap?
Glassbox offers similar core features to Heap, including product analytics with autocapture – Glassbox calls it tagless tracking. It doesn't offer visual labeling tool, however.
Main differences between Glassbox and Heap
- Glassbox includes performance analytics that track app speed and its impact on conversion; Heap doesn't offer native performance monitoring.
- Glassbox offers built-in user feedback collection; Heap doesn't have native survey or feedback tools.
- Heap has a visual event editor for non-technical users to tag and define events retroactively; Glassbox supports autocapture (tagless tracking) but has no equivalent labeling tool.
- Heap offers managed ETL for exporting data to warehouses like Snowflake and BigQuery; Glassbox's data export options are more limited.
- Heap is self-serve with a free tier; Glassbox is sales-driven with no public pricing or free plan.
- Glassbox has a stronger focus on mobile app analytics with native mobile session replay; Heap's mobile replay requires its Contentsquare integration.
Main similarities between Glassbox and Heap
- Both support event autocapture (Glassbox calls it "tagless tracking") that collects data without manual instrumentation.
- Both offer session replay and heatmaps for understanding user behavior.
- Both include product analytics with funnels, user paths, and conversion tracking.
- Neither offers feature flags, A/B testing, or experiments natively.
- Both are closed-source, cloud-only platforms.
- Both are used to diagnose conversion drop-offs and improve user experience.
Why do companies use Glassbox?
According to G2 reviews, customers use Glassbox for:
Session replay and error analysis: Glassbox is best-known for its session replay features, so this is the most popular use case. Customers use Glassbox to analyze user journeys and identify app-breaking bugs.
Heatmap and funnel analysis: Users like the heatmaps feature, which enables them to see user preferences on key pages and use this to visualize user funnels.
Fixing low conversion and abandonment: Glassbox is popular among online retailers, who use it to solve issues around conversion and basket abandonment.
Bottom line
Glassbox is a good Heap alternative for online retailers mostly interested in mobile app analytics and session replay, but SaaS companies should look elsewhere.
4. Pendo
- Founded: 2013
- Most similar to: PostHog, Heap
- Typical users: Product managers and customer success teams
- Typical customers: Small and mid-market B2C companies

What is Pendo?
Pendo describes itself as a product experience platform. In addition to product analytics, it offers session replay, in-app guides, user feedback, and product validation tools.
Key features
Product analytics: Funnels, trends, and retention analysis with event autocapture.
In-app guides: Deliver personalized guidance to customers, directly inside your app.
User feedback: Capture and analyze customer feedback at scale.
Product validation and roadmaps: Plan your product improvements and roadmap using data from Pendo.
How does Pendo compare to Heap?
Pendo offers similar features to Heap, including event autocapture and session replay. It lacks a visual labeling tool for events, however.